Join us and get access to hundreds of tutorials and a community of expert Pythonistas.

Unlock This Lesson

This lesson is for members only. Join us and get access to hundreds of tutorials and a community of expert Pythonistas.

Unlock This Lesson

Hint: You can adjust the default video playback speed in your account settings.
Hint: You can set the default subtitles language in your account settings.
Sorry! Looks like there’s an issue with video playback 🙁 This might be due to a temporary outage or because of a configuration issue with your browser. Please see our video player troubleshooting guide to resolve the issue.

Pros and Cons of Type Hints

Give Feedback

In this lesson, you’ll explore the pros and cons of type hints. In the previous lesson, you took a peek into what type checking in Python looks like. Here are some of the advantages of type hints:

  • Type hints help catch certain errors, as you saw in the previous lesson.

  • Type hints help document your code. Traditionally, you would use docstrings if you wanted to document the expected types of a function’s arguments. This works, but as there is no standard for docstrings (despite PEP 257), they can’t be easily used for automatic checks.

  • Type hints improve IDEs and linters. They make it much easier to statically reason about your code.

  • Type hints help you build and maintain a cleaner architecture. The act of writing type hints forces you to think about the types in your program. While the dynamic nature of Python is one of its great assets, being conscious about relying on duck typing, overloaded methods, or multiple return types is a good thing.

Of course, static type checking is not all peaches and cream. There are also some downside you should consider:

  • Type hints take developer time and effort to add. Even though it probably pays off in spending less time debugging, you will spend more time entering code.

  • Type hints work best in modern Pythons. Annotations were introduced in Python 3.0, and it’s possible to use type comments in Python 2.7. Still, improvements like variable annotations and postponed evaluation of type hints mean that you’ll have a better experience doing type checks using Python 3.6 or even Python 3.7.

  • Type hints introduce a slight penalty in start-up time. If you need to use the typing module, then the import time may be significant, especially in short scripts.

Should you use static type checking in your own code? It’s not an all-or-nothing question. Python supports the concept of gradual typing. This means that you can gradually introduce types into your code. Code without type hints will be ignored by the static type checker. Therefore, you can start adding types to critical components, and continue as long as it adds value to you.

Here are a few rules of thumb on whether to add types to your project:

  • If you’re just beginning to learn Python, you can safely wait with type hints until you have more experience.

  • Type hints add little value in short throwaway scripts.

  • In libraries that will be used by others, especially ones published on PyPI, type hints add a lot of value. Other code using your libraries needs these type hints to be properly type checked itself. For examples of projects using type hints, see cursive_re, black, our own Real Python Reader, and Mypy itself.

  • In bigger projects, type hints help you understand how types flow through your code, and are highly recommended, all the more so in projects where you cooperate with others.

In his excellent article The State of Type Hints in Python, Bernát Gábor recommends that “type hints should be used whenever unit tests are worth writing.” Indeed, type hints play a similar role as tests in your code: they help you as a developer write better code.

Become a Member to join the conversation.